How the COVID relief law will rescue marketplace plan buyers - - Health Insurance Resource Center

Home > Blog > How the COVID relief law will rescue marketplace plan buyers
The American Rescue Plan Act includes a one-time provision that will rescue marketplace plan buyers from repayment of thousands of dollars in excess insurance premium subsidies for the 2020 tax year. | Image: onephoto /
Reviewed by our health policy panel.
EDIT, April 9, 2021: The IRS has issued guidance clarifying how taxpayers should proceed on this issue. People who would have had to repay some or all of their advance premium tax credit from 2020 can simply skip Form 8962, and do not need to reconcile their advance premium tax credit. People who are owed additional premium tax credit (ie, the amount that was paid on their behalf in 2020 ended up being too small) can still claim it by using Form 8962, just as they normally would. People who have already filed a 2020 tax return and repaid excess advance premium tax credits do not need to file an amended return. Instead, the IRS will simply refund the money to them automatically.
The Supreme Court just upheld the ACA. Should marketplace insurance buyers breathe a sigh of relief?
Stressed about having to pay back some or all of the premium subsidy that was paid on your behalf last year? You’re in luck: Under the American Rescue Plan Act (H.R. 1319) – passed by Congress on March 10 and expected to be signed into law by President Biden on March 12 – excess premium subsidies for 2020 do not have to be repaid to the Internal Revenue Service.
This is a one-time provision that’s being granted as part of the federal government’s massive COVID relief measure – which is also significantly increasing premiums subsidies for 2021 and 2022 – and it will come as a great relief to many of the Americans who enrolled in individual and family health plans through the health insurance marketplace /exchange last year.
Although the Affordable Care Act’s premium tax credits (premium subsidies) make health insurance affordable for millions of people, they can be a bit complicated. Unlike other tax credits, they’re available to be used up front, paid directly to your health insurance company throughout the year. (This is called APTC – advance premium tax credit – since it’s paid in advance.)
You can always opt to pay full price for a plan purchased through the exchange and then claim the whole premium tax credit on your tax return, but hardly anyone does that. Instead, most people provide the marketplace with a projection of what they think their income will be for the year, and their estimated premium tax credit is then sent to their insurer throughout the year, reducing the amount they have to pay in premiums.
The catch is that it all has to be reconciled with the IRS when policyholders file their tax returns. Depending on the circumstances, the IRS might give you additional money at that point (if your subsidy was too small), or they might make you repay some or all of the subsidy that was paid on your behalf during the year.
This issue was shaping up to be particularly significant for the 2020 tax year. The combination of additional federal unemployment compensation and erratic employment made it more difficult than usual for people to accurately project their income for 2020. And, as is always the case, folks whose income ended up over 400% of the federal poverty level were facing the prospect of paying back their entire premium subsidy to the IRS – repayments which could be in the thousands or even tens of thousands of dollars, depending on the circumstances.
An income boost that pushed a household over the 400% federal poverty level threshold might have happened because a person received more unemployment benefits than they expected, or because they got a new job later in the year that put their total income above the subsidy eligibility threshold. In normal years, this would mean the entire subsidy has to be repaid, regardless of how low policyholders’ income was during the months they were receiving a premium subsidy through the marketplace.
And even for people whose income stayed under 400 percent of the poverty level, there was the possibility of having to repay as much as $2,700 in excess premium subsidies, depending on the actual income and tax filing status.
But thanks to the American Rescue Plan Act, no marketplace plan buyer will have to worry about repaying excess premium subsidies for 2020. If your subsidy amount was too small, you can still claim the additional amount that you’re owed when you file your taxes. But if your subsidy ended up being too large – even if your income ended up exceeding 400% of the poverty level – you won’t owe any of it back to the IRS.
This is a one-time provision for the 2020 tax year only. So it’s still important to project your income for this year as accurately as possible, and keep the exchange updated if your income changes later this year.
EDIT: The IRS issued guidance in April 2021, clarifying that people in this situation do not need to file amended returns. Instead, the IRS will simply refund the money to them automatically. 
It’s not yet clear exactly how the IRS will handle excess premium tax credits for people who filed their 2020 tax returns earlier this year and already repaid some or all of their premium tax credit for 2020. Amended tax returns can always be used to make a change, although the IRS has advised that tax filers hold off on this for the time being and await further instructions from the IRS.
It’s also not yet clear how quickly tax software will reflect the fact that excess premium subsidies for 2020 do not have to be repaid. Karen Pollitz, a Senior Fellow at Kaiser Family Foundation, notes that “the forms and tax software already provide for repayment, so it will take a while to straighten all this out. And it will probably be very confusing for people who file their tax returns over the next four to five weeks.”
You’ll want to check with your tax preparer or call your tax software company to see if they have any guidance for you. The tax filing deadline has been extended until May 17, 2021, but it’s also possible to request an extension if you need it, giving you until October 15 to file your return.
Louise Norris is an individual health insurance broker who has been writing about health insurance and health reform since 2006. She has written dozens of opinions and educational pieces about the Affordable Care Act for Her state health exchange updates are regularly cited by media who cover health reform and by other health insurance experts.
Helping millions of Americans since 1994.
(Step 1 of 2)
We do not sell insurance products, but this form will connect you with partners of who do sell insurance products. You may submit your information through this form, or call (844) 309-3504 to speak directly with licensed enrollers who will provide advice specific to your situation. Read about your data and privacy.
The mission of and its editorial team is to provide information and resources that help American consumers make informed choices about buying and keeping health coverage. We are nationally recognized experts on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and state health insurance exchanges/marketplaces. Learn more about us.
If you have questions or comments on this service, please contact us.
Tags: American Rescue Plan Act, covid-19, premium subsidies, tax
I sure hope I won’t have to pay back the Premium Tax credits. We sold our rental home and will definitely be above the 400FPL. Will the way the income was earned affect the waived subsidy?
As long as this was in 2020, you won’t have to repay excess premium subsidies, regardless of why your income ended up going above 400% of the poverty level.
In 2021 and future years, there’s no provision to waive excess subsidy repayments, but there’s also no subsidy cliff in 2021 and 2022: That means fewer people will be subject to excess subsidy repayments (or subject to a smaller repayment) for this year and next year, even if their income ends up being higher than they anticipated.
Do you get subsidies from your state (California) if you make more than 400% of the poverty level.
Starting last year, California began offering state-funded premium tax credits that extended up to 600% of the poverty level. But those are no longer necessary, since the American Rescue Plan is now offering even more robust premium tax credits, covering more than the amount California had been covering. So people enrolling via CoveredCA will now see larger federal premium tax credits, but no California-specific tax credits:
Do You Know that how long, IRS will take to take action and also should I file my tax yet? and Pay the Premium Tax credit?
The IRS is working on this, and they’ve said that they’ll put out more information as it becomes available:
Also, Is it for APTC too?
Do you mean APTC for this year? That’s also affected by the American Rescue Plan:
CMS has said that the new APTC amounts will be available on as of April 1 (the 15 state-based marketplaces are working on this, but should have it available soon as well). After that, enrollees can log back into their accounts to activate the new subsidy amounts:
I mean for the 2020 tax year, because I have lot of advance premium tax credit that says i have to pay back to ira
For 2020, nobody will have to pay back excess premium tax credits (excess APTC) that were paid on their behalf during the year. But the IRS is still working with tax software companies to get this straightened out, as the systems have all been programmed to show that people have to repay those excess subsidies. The extension of the tax filing deadline to May 17 should help to give people some breathing room on this, while we wait for the tax software to catch up with the law.
Thanks for this article. You just saved my client a lot headache and agony. She was looking at repaying back $8,200. Great job on pick up on this
I may need you to be my lawyer…lol. I had market place coverage and didnt know til i got a 1095 a…
Will CA state taxes follow the feds in waiving repayment of excess PTC? Currently, TurboTax shows that I must repay the $800 limit for federal AND another $800 for CA. This seems like duplicate repayment to me, but TurboTax insists it’s correct. Might the CA repayment be forgiven too?
California provides its own premium tax credits, in addition to what the federal government provides. You do not have to repay anything to the IRS, but TurboTax is still working to update their systems to reflect this.
I have not heard anything from California, however, about whether they might take similar action. If they do not, you would still have to repay any excess premium subsidy that the state of California paid on you behalf.
How can I tell how much subsidy, if any, I received from CA? I have no documentation from CA, only the Federal 1095A. The calculations in TurboTax for CA seem to reduplicate the Federal ones wrongly, i.e., I’m repaying the same excess subsidy twice.
You are not paying twice, they just use the same numbers to calculate. The percentage of tax is different, as are the amounts you pay the state. You put your income in there, it’s on both state and federal. They are treated completely differently. I’m not sure how else to explain it. I understand why you might think that, but that’s just not the case. <happy emoji>
When you go into your CoveredCA account, are you able to see a breakdown of the subsidy amounts? CoveredCA’s plan comparison tool does break it down in terms of how much of the subsidy is federal and how much is state — it shows those numbers if you hover over the total subsidy amount (on the plan comparison page where it shows each available plan and the total subsidy amount).
CoveredCA does have a limit on excess subsidy repayments: (assuming they do make people repay excess state subsidy amounts for 2020)
Thanks for all the prompt help here! I didn’t even know that CA offered an additional PTC, and didn’t receive one. I had made an ignorant mistake in TurboTax by entering my Fed 1095-A numbers into the CA 3895 form (they look almost identical). Thus I was repaying excess subsidy twice. Once Intuit implements their fix for IRS repayment forgiveness, I won’t have to pay any penalty, and it looks as if I’ll even receive a tiny subsidy from CA instead of an $800 tax bill! Thanks again!
I seem to recall that the amount CA paid was much smaller than the federal payment of subsidies. But the total of the excess is being paid back in Turbotax to CA only. This seems to be an error to me. The fed return says I don’t owe anything. But CA return says I owe a lot is excess payment. So the question is, is CA really make us pay the excess, or is this not caught up yet in Turbo tax, the covid relief bill?
As far as we know, California is still requiring people to repay excess premium subsidies that were paid on their behalf in 2020. They do have limitations on how much a tax filer has to repay, in case subsidy amounts exceed those limits (that’s fairly unlikely, given that California’s state-based subsidies generally aren’t as large as the federal subsidies):
So TurboTax should be showing that you do not have to repay any of your federal premium tax credit (you shouldn’t have to file Form 8962 at all, if you would otherwise have had to repay some or all of your advance premium tax credit). But it should be showing that you do have to repay some or all of the premium tax credit you received from the state of California, if you ended up qualifying for a smaller amount than the state paid on your behalf last year.
TurboTax is having me pay back Fed subsidies to the state of California I believe. but I’m not sure. I signed up on the ACA in 2020 in June, so does that mean most my subsidies came from CA?
I had Marketplace and employer provided healthcare at the same time for 3 months. Will I have to repay the APTC for those 3 months?
It doesn’t matter why the excess premium tax credits would otherwise be owed – amounts that would have to be repaid on Line 29 of Form 8962 do not have to be repaid for 2020, thanks to the American Rescue Plan. But the IRS is still sorting out the details as to how this will work in practice and how to address this issue for people who already filed and repaid excess premium subsidies for 2020:
Anyone know why I am looking at having to pay back the state, CA, not fed, those subsidies.???
As of 2020, California started offering its own state-funded premium subsidies, in addition to the subsidies that the federal government provides:
Just like the federal subsidies, California’s subsidies have to be reconciled at tax time (on the state tax return, whereas the federal subsidies get reconciled on Form 8962, which goes along with your 1040). I have not heard anything about California offering the sort of repayment amnesty that the federal government is offering for 2020, but you might want to reach out to the state tax department or a tax advisor to see if there’s any information about this.
Married filing together, 2 adults and 2 kids and the 2019 income were 60K. We got ACA and the tax filing was fine. But I almost got a heart attack as our 2020 AGI is 106 and according to HR Block and Turbo Tax, I have to pay back all the $12450 in the subsidy we received. According to this article, I think I don’t have to pay anything. However, why the Turbo Tax calculation is still showing that I have to pay this amount? Are they going to change it soon?
The IRS is working with tax software companies to get this updated, but we haven’t yet seen a timeframe for when this will happen. For now, the IRS is saying they will “provide more details soon”
Turbo Tax might be able to give you an idea of when they’ll have this adjusted, if you call them directly. Also, the IRS has extended the tax filing deadline to May 17, which helps to provide a bit more wiggle room on this. (a lot of states have also followed suit: )
Does the unemployment exclusion of $10200.00 need to be added back into your income for line 2a of form 8962
Excess premium tax credits do not have to be repaid for 2020, regardless of the circumstances. But this is an important question in terms of reconciling premium tax credits and potentially claiming an *additional* amount that’s owed to you. The IRS page for Form 8962 still indicates that they’re working through the details:
I would advise that you consult with a tax professional to see if they have any insight on this, and stay tuned to that IRS page for further information about how Form 8962 will be processed for 2020 tax returns.
Thank you so much for your timely responses in this comment section. This is the best article on this topic which I could find online, still waiting on the tax software updates… Please keep us updated on when these updates become available.
Best article so far on this issue. I noticed that most tax softwares have not been updated to reflect this change. This provision in The American Rescue Plan is a game changer for many essential workers who ended up owing thousands in advance premium tax credit to the IRS.
Thank you, glad it was helpful! Yes, the tax software companies have a lot of updating to do as a result of the ARP, and unfortunately, it comes at their busiest time of the year. My understanding is that they’re all working with the IRS to get the changes implemented as soon as possible.
I’ve had this article bookmarked for more than two weeks, as it’s been really helpful. Related to what others here have commented, Intuit says they’ve completed all TurboTax updates for ARP and that the forgiveness on PTC for 2020 only pertains to people up to 400% FPL. If I “fake” a lower income up to 400% FPL, there’s no clawback, which shows that Intuit has implemented the tax change. A mock return with FreeTaxUSA reveals same. I reached someone at Intuit yesterday who communicated with their tax experts and they say that they don’t foresee any future changes, but if they got the policy wrong, they would appreciate notification at Louise, any further insight into this situation? (I also Tweeted you before seeing this comment section.)
I responded on Twitter, but wanted to reply here as well in case other readers have a similar experience. I believe TurboTax is incorrect in this situation, and various other health policy experts agree. For example, see Health Affairs, here:
Section 9662 of the American Rescue Plan adjusts Section 36B(f)(2) for 2020 only. It states that Subparagraph A of Section 36B(f)(2) shall not apply for 2020. Subparagraph A is the provision that requires excess premium tax credits (at any income level) to be repaid to the IRS, either in full or under the terms of the repayment limits that are described in 36(B)(f)(2)(B)(ii). So for 2020 only, the entire section about repaying excess premium tax credits is essentially moot.
The IRS has said that they’re working on this. For the time being, they’re advising people to NOT file an amended return if they already filed their 2020 return and repaid some or all of their premium tax credit: As of late March, the IRS indicated in a webinar that they are working on a more simplified way for people in that situation to recoup the money they repaid to the IRS earlier in the year, but the details are not yet available.
I believe Intuit still has not fully fixed their APTC repayment calcs as of today. I am at 203%, and Turbotax Home and Business is still claiming I need to repay $800. I can’t seem to find how or where I can report this error to them.
TurboTax had a blog post last month detailing the ARP’s provisions, and it included the fact that repayment of excess premium tax credits for 2020 would be waived: So they’re aware of it, but I’m not sure how long it will take them to get it sorted out. If they have a customer service chat/email/phone feature, you may be able to contact them directly. Hopefully the one-month extension that the IRS has granted for filing 2020 tax returns will give all of the tax software companies enough time to get this straightened out.
My question is i didnt know i was enrolled in marketplace. We were using my husbands insurance. Will i have to repay because of the double coverage i had no knowledge of?
That would normally result in having to repay the premium subsidy, but the American Rescue Plan has eliminated excess subsidy repayments for 2020. The IRS is still sorting out the details. Publication 974 addresses the specific rules around premium tax credits, but the IRS currently has a placeholder page there, as they’re updating that publication to include the ARP’s provisions: You might also want to keep an eye on the page about Form 8962, as that will need an overhaul for 2020 as well:
Also i had my adult son who was 22 on the employer plan and marketplace plan. He did not receive a letter for an 8962 or a 1095a. I put on my 1095a that i would be responsible for 100%. Would he still need to send in a 1095a and an 8962? TIA.
The IRS is still sorting out how they’re going to handle this. Form 1095A is just for your records; it does not have to be sent to the IRS (the marketplace sends them a copy). If your son is not your tax dependent, you’d each file Form 8962, but you could use the scenario described in “allocation situation 4” in the instructions for Form 8962: (ie, one taxpayer takes 100% of the premium tax credit, the other takes 0%).
But again, since excess premium subsidies do not need to be repaid for 2020, the IRS is still working out the details in terms of how Form 8962 needs to be adjusted. Fortunately, the federal tax filing deadline has been extended to May 17, and almost all of the states have followed suit.
Thank you. Talking to you gives me hope. The funny thing is the irs has no knowledge of the 2020 forgiveness of the aptc. They should have told something by now atleast.
Pat Terkelson. my 52 year old daughter had no income in 2020 but she got the forms from the market place indicating if she got these forms she must file a tax return. So no income and she has been paying her premium with her stimulus money. What does she need to do?
Did she have an income when she applied for her 2020 coverage, and was she approved for a premium tax credit based on that income? If so, the 1095-A that the marketplace sent to her would reflect that – it should show the amount of premium tax credit that was paid on her behalf. If she ended up with no income at all, she wouldn’t have to repay the premium tax credit even in a normal year, as described here:
For 2020, however, nobody has to repay excess premium subsidies. But the IRS is still sorting out the details on this, so we’re not yet sure how they’ll handle it. If she got a Form 1095-A that shows a premium tax credit was paid on her behalf, the normal rules say that she has to file Form 8962 to reconcile that tax credit. But the IRS might change that for 2020, in the case of people who aren’t owed additional premium tax credits.
If I do not have to repay the premium excess, and I already filed taxes; would that mean I will be refunded with any amount of money? Thank you.
Yes. But the IRS is working on a more simplified approach than an amended return, and they’re advising people who have already filed and repaid excess premium tax credits to wait for now, and NOT file an amended return in order to get the money refunded:
As always, those who do the right thing, play by the rules and do the correct math, get screwed. Where is the bonus for those of us that worked our entire lives, saved for our retirement and provided for our families aren’t included in the bribes. What kind of message does this send to those growing up to compete in the job market? How will anyone develop a work ethic when all they get for it is being hosed by paying for those that will not work? Who will pay for the freebies when everyone learns they don’t have to work and they’ll still be taken care of by Uncle Sugar.
In the case of this particular provision in the American Rescue Plan, it’s actually the exact opposite of what you’re describing. It’s designed to protect people who ended up earning more than they thought they would in 2020. Perhaps they lost a job (and with it, their health insurance) when the pandemic began, and enrolled in a marketplace health insurance plan in an effort to be responsible and maintain health coverage. They predicted their total annual income as best they could at that point, but the year was only a few months old at that point, and nobody really knew what the rest of 2020 would bring.
Perhaps that person ended up being rehired in the fall, either by their old employer or a new one — demonstrating the work ethic you like to see. But if the income from that job ended up pushing them above 400% of the poverty level for the whole year, they would have been on the hook to repay the entire premium subsidy from the months that they were between jobs (whereas if they had not returned to work, they might not have earned enough to push them over that limit, and would not have had to repay the full subsidy).
For people with variable incomes, accurately projecting the full year’s income can be challenging in the best of times. In 2020, it was virtually impossible. So this provision in the American Rescue Plan ensures that people are not penalized for having been able to find work again later in 2020.
During your working years, did you receive employer-sponsored health coverage? If so, you benefited greatly from the tax exclusion of that coverage, which costs the federal government far more than the premium tax credits that are provided for people who buy their own health insurance:
If you purchased your own coverage in the pre-ACA days, it’s true that you didn’t receive any assistance with the premiums and your premiums may not have been tax deductible. But health care costs have increased greatly over the last few decades, pushing health insurance premiums into an unaffordable range for most people. For people who receive employer-sponsored coverage, employers pay the majority of the premiums (and again, it’s all pre-tax): For people who buy their own coverage, premium tax credits level the playing field somewhat, making coverage roughly as affordable as employer-sponsored coverage is after the generous employer subsidies and tax breaks.
You are both correct in certain ways, BUT the enrollee was required to go into there account to report change of income so in your example of going back to work in the Fall, they should have reported a life change of income and the premium subsidy would have been adjusted. So in reality the person that did report the life change as required got hosed and the one that did not report the life change got the benefit.
David, in the situation you’re describing, the person would still be protected by the ARP. Assuming they did report their new income to the exchange in the fall (or cancel the policy altogether, if they became eligible for a new employer-sponsored plan), their subsidy would have been terminated for the remainder of the year. But under normal rules, they would still have then had to repay the IRS all of the premium tax credit that was paid on their behalf for the earlier months of the year, since their total income for the year would have ended up above 400% of the poverty level.
Thanks to the ARP, they don’t have to repay the subsidy for those earlier months of 2020.
(And also thanks to the ARP, there isn’t a hard income limit of 400% of the poverty level for subsidy eligibility, for 2021 and 2022. That means people who earn more than 400% of the poverty level this year or next year are not necessarily on the hook to repay all of it to the IRS, as would normally have been the case.)
But since they reported their new income as required, they lose the subsidy for the remaining months of the year if they stay on the individual exchange plan even though they do not have to repay the subsidy for the earlier months, right? But if they do not report the new income they keep the subsidy for the rest of the year and do not have to repay it at all. So Bruce F is partially correct.
Yes, for 2020 only, that would be the case. Although the person you describe would have been taking a significant risk of having to repay all that money during tax season, since the ARP’s repayment amnesty was a one-time provision enacted well into the tax filing season for 2020 returns.
In a normal year, the subsidies would either get cut off if and when the person reports an income that makes them ineligible for subsidies, or would have to be repaid when they file taxes. Normally, the full subsidy amount would have to be repaid if they go over 400% of FPL — regardless of whether they report it mid-year or wait until they file taxes — but that’s not true for 2021 and 2022, thanks to the American Rescue Plan.
But because everything was such a mess with COVID in 2020, Congress decided to make an exception and just help people out. Something like that can never be done perfectly, as everyone’s situation is different. But I think they absolutely made the right call by making sure people wouldn’t have to repay any excess subsidies from a year when income was so volatile and hard to project.
Why can you not report an income change, and not be penalized for the months you needed the subsidy? If I finally get a Good job, why would I take it if it’s going to cost me in the long run? I finally am able to work, but it’ll push me over the 400%. I have to work a month (or more)for free just to pay back the subsidy that they allowed me to have when I couldn’t afford it! Some help that is! And now I find out that the unemployment, plus the extra, that people got, and I don’t blame them really, does not even count towards earned income?? I’m screwed no matter what I do!
OK I get that the ARP Act includes a no pay back provision for 2020 tax year, but how do you process this forgiveness within your 1040
Excess premium tax credits are reported on Line 29 of Form 8962, and normally have to be repaid to the IRS when you file your taxes. As a result of the ARP, any amount on Line 29 of Form 8962 does not have to be repaid, but it’s taking a while for tax software systems to sort this out. The IRS is still telling people to hang tight and wait for more information if they’ve already filed and repaid excess premium tax credits:
If you’re using an accountant, they should be fairly well versed in this by now. If you’re using tax prep software, you may be able to contact the customer service number to see if they have any advice, assuming their system is still (erroneously) showing that you do need to repay an amount for Line 29 of Form 8962.
Fortunately, the tax filing deadline has been extended through May 17, giving tax filers (and tax software companies) a little extra breathing room to get this sorted out.
Anyone interested-HR Block just updated their tax software to account for this.
Thanks, Amber. That’s great news!
Fantastic article. Thank You. I have a question about 2021 and 2022 and the repayment limitation, specifically for over 400% FPL. Currently the repayment limitation for married filing jointly 300% – 400% range is $2,700. Understanding that this is waived for 2020, is there any indication what repayment limitation will be for over 400% in 2021 and 2022, given that the maximum percentage of household income will be capped at 8.5%? Thank You
The IRS has not yet clarified this. They are currently working on a revised version of Publication 974: And the 2021 version of the instructions for Form 8962 (which normally has the excess APTC repayment limitations) has not yet been published. But I would say it’s reasonable to assume that there might be at least some sort of repayment limitations above 400% of FPL.
My billiing statement in balance due $0.00 with the other column saying APTC $552.00. Can I pay what I can for the monthly bill?
We recommend that you reach out to your insurer if you have a question about your bill. But if your invoice shows $0 due, it likely means that the APTC (premium tax credit) is sufficient to fully cover the cost of the plan you’ve chosen. Does that sound right based on what you saw when you enrolled? If your tax credit is enough to cover the full cost of your plan, you do not need to pay anything else. But again, check with your insurer to make sure you’re not missing anything.
How do I ensure that I don’t have to pay back these large amount of subsidies next year? I am barely above the poverty line and cannot afford to pay back over $2000 for the Bronze level insurance plan that I have.
The complete amnesty on repaying any excess advance premium tax credits only applies to the 2020 plan/tax year (for tax returns that are being filed in 2021).
But even in a regular year, including the 2021 plan/tax year, there’s a limit on how much you’d have to repay if your subsidy ends up being too large once the year is over and your income is known. Here’s how it works: (for a single person earning up to double the poverty level, the current maximum repayment amount is $325).
I paid it back all ready how long till the irs refunds my cash ?
Unfortunately, the IRS has not said exactly when you should expect to receive a refund of the excess APTC that you repaid with your 2020 tax return. They have clarified that you don’t need to file an amended return in order to get the money back: They’re working on it, although it’s not clear how long that will take. They might be able to give you some more concrete information about your specific return if you call them directly.
What about 2021? We have had some unexpected hospital bills and other expenses. We are both retired but I am only 64. And I would like to pull some money out of 401k to just pay bills. But if I do that I will have to pay back subsidy. I don’t want to borrow money but savings is running low. What do I do?
The complete amnesty for subsidy repayments was a one-time provision, for 2020 only. But for 2021 and 2022, the American Rescue Plan has eliminated the “subsidy cliff.” Here’s more about that: The short story is that you don’t have to pay back the full subsidy just because your income goes over 400% of the poverty level. As long as the second-lowest-cost Silver plan would still have been more than 8.5% of your income (including the money you get from the retirement plan), you’ll still be eligible for at least some subsidy this year.
Depending on how much you pull out of your retirement plan, you may have to pay back some of your subsidy, but you may find that you’re still subsidy-eligible even with the distribution from the retirement plan, regardless of whether it puts you over 400% of the poverty level.
We always recommend that you consult with a financial advisor or tax professional in situations like this, as there are various ramifications to taking withdrawals from retirement accounts.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.